Wednesday, December 25, 2013

Dialectical Behavior Therapy Presents "DBT As Gambler" with Lyrics





"DBT As Gambler" (to the tune of "The Gambler") was written by Charlie Swenson (2012) and performed by Charlie Swenson, Marsha Linehan, Helen Best, Shireen Rizvi, Melanie Harned, Adam Payne, Alec Miller, and Clive Robins at the annual ISITDBT conference in November 2013.  

Charlie Swenson and Shireen Rizvi performed the karaoke version of "The Gambler" after a long day of intensive training.  Swenson later wrote "DBT As Gambler" during a training in Maine. 

"DBT As Gambler" by Charlie Swenson (2012)

On a warm summer's evenin'
On my way back from treatment
I met up with a gambler
His game was DBT

We took turns a talkin'
'bout how things were goin'
Whether I was changin'
Through my therapy

He said, "Son I've made my life
Out of hearing people's stories
Seein' where they're stuck
And helpin' them to see,
So if you don't mind my sayin'
I can see you're goin' nowhere
If you give me some commitment
I'll try to set you free."

I knew he had me goin' 
When I gave him my commitment
That I would change my life
Instead of waitin' 'til I die
And the air grew very still
He sounded so irreverent,
Said, "if you want to fix your problems
Ya' got to look 'em in the eye."


Refrain
You've got to know when to solve 'em
Know when to soothe 'em
Know when to suck it up
And know when to run


You've never made no progress
Avoidin' all the struggles
You gotta sit down at the table
And join in on the fun


Now every gambler knows
The secret to effectiveness
Is knowin' when to validate
And knowin' when to fight
'Cause every day's a good one
And every day's a bad one
And the best you can hope for
Is to go to sleep each night.


So when he finished speakin'
And vanished into nowhere
I knew that he had dealt me
Some cards that I could play.
Now every time I hit a wall
And I think I'm goin' nowhere
I focus my attention
On the words I heard him say.

Refrain
You've got to know when to solve 'em
Know when to soothe 'em
Know when to suck it up
And know when to run


You've never made no progress
Avoidin' all the struggles
You gotta sit down at the table
And join in on the fun

Refrain (repeat)
You've got to know when to solve 'em
Know when to soothe 'em
Know when to suck it up
And know when to run


You've never made no progress
Avoidin' all the struggles
You gotta sit down at the table
And join in on the fun

Saturday, December 7, 2013

DBT Chain Analysis and Solution Analysis with Shireen Rizvi and Lorie Ritschel

"Mastering the Art of Behavioral Chain Analyses in Dialectical Behavior Therapy" was presented by Dr. Shireen Rizvi and Dr. Lorie Ritschel at the Association of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies (ABCT) on November 23, 2013.  

The primary topics were designed for therapists to review and learn the steps of creating chain analyses and solution analyses.  This was not limited to therapists who use dialectical behavior therapy.  Some of the terms used below have roots in other disciplines and theoretical orientations.  These terms will be presented using standard DBT terminology.

Chain analysis is the DBT term for behavior analysis.  One of the goals in creating chains is "to understand fully all events that led to the antecedents and consequences," said Shireen Rizvi.  

One of the differences between the solution analysis is DBT and other therapies is the emphasis on DBT solutions and skills, rather than focusing only on the consequences of the problem behavior. 

The chains presented used the visual model of DBT chains: starting with the vulnerability factors, determining the prompting event, following the links in the chain, creating alternative responses, targeting problem behaviors, and considering the consequences.  




The content in the chain analysis might not be presented in this order.  Dr. Marsha Linehan's manual for Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for the Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder begins with defining the problem behavior.  This might not be the first round of information presented by the client.  

The treatment hierarchy will determine which problem behavior will be analyzed first. In order, the treatment hierarchy is life-threatening behaviors, therapy-interfering behaviors, and quality of life behaviors.  These will be discussed in greater detail in a future post.

There can be multiple problem behaviors.  In sifting through a set of life-threatening behaviors, assess if the behavior is an action, urge, or ideation.   

The action is the trump card and will be discussed first, followed by urge, and ideation in the hierarchy.  

"Vulnerability factors provide context" for precipitating events and what led up to the straw that broke the camel's back (Koerner, 2012, p. 37-38).  Vulnerability factors can be thoughts, behaviors, actions, and emotions.  I would imagine that there are often multiple vulnerability factors that created the setting that led to the problem behavior.

In looking at the links in the chain, there needs to be a high level of detail.  Shari Manning described this as writing a movie script that is so specific that it could be directed and viewed by others.  Look for emotions, thoughts, sensations, and events. Be concise, specific, and precise. 

Physiological sensations: "What were you feeling in your body when you saw the email from your ex-boyfriend?"

Thoughts: "What were you thinking about when you looked at your iPhone after your ex-boyfriend emailed you?"

Emotions: "What was your emotion when you read the email from your ex-boyfriend?"

The last part of the DBT chain analysis is clarifying the consequences.  DBT describes consequences as "immediate or delayed reactions of the client and others that followed the problem behavior" (Koerner, 2012, p. 42).  These can be distal and proximal.  

The process of clarifying the consequences can be very dysregulating and may trigger strong emotions, such as shame and anger.  Therapists may be sure to orient the client to explain that dysregulation may arise from a thorough discussion of the problem behavior. 

 Shireen Rizvi discussed this as a possibility that the therapist may not want to hold the cue, which can result in changing the topic and reinforcing emotional avoidance.  She said this process is hard for the therapist and client.  Sometimes the therapist might not want to hold the cue, noticing the client's pain and tears.  She pointed back to the function of chain analyses as a way to understand behaviors so that they can work together to prevent them from coming back.